Wu Wei – Thoughts from 2005


Applying the Ancient Concept of Wu Wei to Modern Leadership

“The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing in the right place, but…to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment.”[1] – Dorothy Nevill

 The premise of leaving words unsaid and non-action, or wu wei as per Lao Tzu in Tao Te Ching, seems paradoxical in the context of the modern world’s organizations predilection for high productivity.   Yet, the urgency to take action can lead to unintended impact and even harmful unforeseen consequences.   Instead, becoming internally directed by “continually examining [our] own hypocrisy and closing the gaps between [our] values and behaviour,”[2]  and engaging in reflective action is the way to determine the optimal leverage points for action. 

There are many contemporary references to the need for and application of the non-action principle as an integral component of leadership.   Robert Quinn’s Fundamental State of Leadership described in Building The Bridge As You Walk On It states, “Most of us in the organizational world…are engulfed in action, at the expense of contemplation and reflection.  This extreme is just as isolating as the extreme of contemplation divorced from action.”[3]    Goleman et.al describes the connection between resonant leadership and self-awareness traits with the propensity for quiet self-reflection and thoughtfulness being the most effective even though it is the least visibly active.[4]  Empowerment is a form of non-action where rather than taking action themselves, leaders open space to creative tension within others thereby giving rise to deep thoughts and innovation   The power of this is illustrated in transformational coaching which advocates silence after asking a question to allow the client reflection time and demonstrate the intention to listen.[5]  So too, the process of Appreciative Inquiry implies the use of non-action during the first two reflective stages of the 4D model; discovery of what is working well and dreaming to imagine what might be.[6]  Lastly, non action is significant in systems thinking where it is important to seek understanding before taking action as stated by Donella Meadows in Dancing with Systems:  

  • Get the beat; before you disturb a system, watch how it behaves; study its beat, watch it work,
  • Stay humble. Stay a learner; …trust intuition more and figuring-out rationality less,
  • Listen to the wisdom of the system; …don’t be an unthinking intervener… Rather, pay attention to the value of what’s already there and help the system run itself. [7]

In conclusion, it is important not to mistake non-action for inertia and underestimate its application in organizational leadership.  Choosing inaction, or in this case non-action, is still active and has consequences as a river flowing naturally changes the landscape with erosion.   Likewise, consider how black and white contrast each other to give a picture perspective and feeling pain gives greater context to our experience of joy.   As per Newton’s third law of motion where “for every action there is equal and opposite reaction,”[8] similarly, it is non-action that makes action constructive as is illustrated by Lao Tzu’s in Tao Teh Ching, Chapter 11:

We make a vessel from a lump of clay;
It is the empty space within the vessel that makes it useful,
We make doors and windows for a room;
But it is these empty spaces that make the room liveable.
Thus, while the tangible has advantages,
It is the intangible that makes it useful.[9]

Through this active non-action, going slow to go fast, “The peaceful and serene, [can be] the Norm of the World.”[10]

Reference List

“A.I. Publications and Workbook Series.” Lakeshore Communications Website,, accessed June 2, 2005.

“Newton’s Laws of Motion.” Answers.com Website, <http://www.answers.com/topic/newton-slaws-of-motion&gt;, accessed June 9, 2005.

Crane, Thomas G. The Heart of Coaching: Using Transformational Coaching to Create a High-Performance Culture. San Diego: FTA Press, 2002. Reprint, Second Edition.

Goleman, Daniel, Richard Boyatzis, and Annie McKee. Primal Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.

Meadows, Donella. Dancing with Systems. In Whole Earth, Winter 2001,<http://www.wholeearthmag.com/ArticleBin/447.html&gt;. (accessed April 1, 2005).

Quinn, Robert E. Building the Bridge as You Walk on It. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.

Tzu, Lao. Tao Teh Ching. Translated by John C.H. Wu. Boston: Shambala Publications Inc, 2003.

 Footnotes:

[1]Dorothy Nevill, quoted in Ibid. p 164.
[2]  Robert E. Quinn, Building The Bridge As You Walk On It (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004). p 22.
[3] Ibid. p 99.
[4] Daniel Goleman, Richard Boyatzis, and Annie McKee, Primal Leadership (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002). p40
[5] Thomas G. Crane, The Heart Of Coaching: Using Transformational Coaching To Create a High-Performance  Culture (San Diego: FTA Press, 2002; reprint, Second Edition). p 102.
[6] “A.I. Publications and Workbook Series,” Lakeshore Communications Website,<http://www.lakeshorepublishers.com/aiwebsite/index.htm&gt;, accessed June 2, 2005.
[7] Donella Meadows, Dancing with Systems (Winter 2001) (June 2, 2005 [cited April 1 2005]); available from <http://www.wholeearthmag.com/ArticleBin/447.html&gt;.
[8 ] “Newton’s Laws of Motion,” Answers.com Website, http://www.answers.com/topic/newton-s-laws-of-motion, accessed June 9, 2005.
 [9 ]Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, trans. John C.H. Wu (Boston: Shambala Publications Inc, 2003).p 164
[10] Ibid. p 105

Advertisements

About tether abundance

abundance tetherer, social advocate, bodacious blogger, jill of all trades, rebel businesswoman, ah-ha coach, caring friend, soul sister, blessed daughter, laughin', learnin' & lovin' along the thrilling roller coaster journey of my life. Personable and perceptive, I'm all about the abundance, the glass half full, I get jazzed about making a difference where I can together with other people. Like everyone, I've lived through the good, the bad and the ugly times, personally and professionally, that are inevitable in life's journey. Along the way, I've been fortunate to learn non-stop, get a BSc.and MBA, and had my fair share of success over 28 years working with a fascinating array of people in a diverse range of industries, sectors and organizations, from single person entrepreneurs to global Fortune 500 companies.
This entry was posted in coaching | consulting, emotional and social intelligence, leadership & learning, mind tilt, things that make you go 'hmmm'..., things that make you go 'mmmmm'..., Wu Wei and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Wu Wei – Thoughts from 2005

  1. Pingback: Change…“What would happen if you did?” | tiltabilities

  2. carolburbank says:

    Reblogged this on Lead Me On and commented:
    This is an interesting blog on appreciative inquiry and non-action — not “inaction” – that is, refusing to act and therefore freezing a situation in a troublesome stagnancy. It’s an interesting idea about leadership — honoring the need to learn, to listen and to observe. Something many of us think we have no time for — until our actions lead us into a cul-de-sac that was preventable…. He writes, quoting Donella Meadows’ book, Dancing With Systems…
    “Get the beat; before you disturb a system, watch how it behaves; study its beat, watch it work,
    Stay humble. Stay a learner; …trust intuition more and figuring-out rationality less,
    Listen to the wisdom of the system; …don’t be an unthinking intervener… Rather, pay attention to the value of what’s already there and help the system run itself. [7]”

    • tiltabilities says:

      Thank you Carol for your comment. In particular, I appreciate you highlighting the difference between non-action – wu wei – and inaction. Non-action is still very active in that a conscious decision and choice is made to not act. Whereas, I view inaction more as failure to act, a paralysis or as you said freezing a situation in a troublesome state. The reasons for inaction are numerous and intertwined including:
      – being incapable as lacking skill set required,
      – lack of authority or responsibility to act
      – unwilling to act due to competing agenda either personally or professionally
      – fear of retribution or unintended negative impact, again personally, professionally, or system wide.

      Ah what fun eh? Human behaviour and systems….never a dull moment.

      Thank you again Carol for your thoughtful and thought provoking comment. 🙂

      • carolburbank says:

        It’s an important distinction. I like your assessment of reasons for inaction — particularly “fear.” In the west, we love leaders who are decisive, who act, who lead heroically, often as warriors. Somehow, fear plays into unconscious action as well! Chaos either way!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s